<i>De novo</i> germline mutation in the Dual Specificity Phosphatase 10 gene accelerates autoimmune diabetes in Non-Obese Diabetic (NOD) mice
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Here we report the isolation by selective breeding of two sublines of Non-Obese Diabetic (NOD) mice exhibiting a significant difference in the incidence of autoimmune type 1 diabetes (T1D). Whole genome sequencing of the NOD/Nck H (high T1D incidence) and NOD/Nck L (low T1D incidence) revealed the presence of a limited number of variants specific to each subline. Treating the age of T1D onset as a quantitative trait and using automated meiotic mapping (AMM), enhanced susceptibility in the NOD/Nck H subline was unambiguously attributed to a recessive allele of Dusp10 which encodes a dual specificity phosphatase. The causative effect of the mutation was verified with a high level of confidence by targeting Dusp10 with CRISPR/Cas9 in NOD/Nck L mice: in these animals a higher incidence of diabetes was observed. Expression of wild-type Dusp10 correlated with higher levels of surface PD-L1 in the islets of NOD/Nck L mice.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".