MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3118781590

Variations contemporaines sur un topos éculé : l’éros pédagogique dans le roman de l’étudiant·e en lettres au Québec (2000-2020)

2020· article· fr· W3118781590 on OpenAlexaffabout
Karol’Ann Boivin

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue critique de fixxion française contemporaine · 2020
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTopos theoryHumanitiesCharacter (mathematics)ArtQueen (butterfly)Representation (politics)PhilosophyArt historyLiteratureMathematicsPoliticsGeometry
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The aim of this paper is to understand the power dynamics in hierarchical relationships involving university student characters and their professors. Taking Quebec novels as an example, I examine a sample of 11 novels with a literature student as the main character, chosen on the basis of the representation of at least one libidinous academic: La dot de la Mere Missel (2000), by Pierre Tourangeau; Carnets de naufrage (2000), by Guillaume Vigneault; La breche (2002), by Marie-Sissi Labreche; Scrapbook (2004), by Nadine Bismuth; Tarquimpol (2007), by Serge Lamothe; Catastrophes (2007), by Pierre Samson; L'impudeur (2008), by Alain Roy; Entheos (2008), by Julie Gravel-Richard; L'amour des maitres (2011), by Melissa Gregoire; Le corps des femmes est un champ de bataille (2012), by Laurent Chabin; and PsychoZe , by Marie-Christine Arbour (2016). It appears that these representations follow two paths: on the one hand, the pedagogical eros can be recovered in carnivalesque logic; on the other hand, it can also serve as a catalyst (positive or not) for the protagonists' quest for learning. Whether pedagogical eros is accompanied by an arsenal of stereotypes or serves as a turning point in a successful quest for the self, its serial analysis reveals certain mechanisms that make sex and power permutable.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.824
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevue critique de fixxion française contemporaineSame topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207