Clinical and Endoscopic Characteristics of Chinese Cronkhite-Canada Syndrome Patients: A Retrospective Study of 103 Cases
Bibliographic record
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Cronkhite-Canada syndrome (CCS) is a rare non-inherited disease characterized by extensive gastrointestinal (GI) polyposis and ectodermal dysplasia. So far, most of CCS related literatures are published as single case report or reviewed with limited case numbers. Our study was to update the clinical and endoscopic characteristics of Chinese CCS patients. METHODS: This retrospective study was conducted in 103 Chinese CCS patients (102 cases from literatures and 1 case from our department). Their clinical and endoscopic data were collected, and statistical analyses were performed. RESULTS: (1) In Chinese population, people aged 50-70 years (62.62%) had a high incidence of CCS, and the ratio of male-to-female was 2.68:1. (2) The diverse range of GI manifestations was observed in all the patients, and almost all the patients had at least 1 symptom of ectodermal dysplasias. (3) All CCS patients presented multiple polyps in the GI tract except esophagus, and the size and appearance of polyps were diverse. Congestion, edema, and erosion were very common on the surface of polyps (96.83%) and the surrounding mucosa (85.71%). (4) The common pathological features of polyps were hyperplastic polyps (49.25%) and tubular adenomatous polyps (44.78%). The prevalence of cancer was 5.97% in Chinese CCS patients. CONCLUSIONS: Middle-aged and elderly people are the high-risk group. Various GI symptoms are observed in Chinese patients; the typical endoscopic finding is multiple small sessile polyps. These GI polyps have a chance of malignant potential. Long-term endoscopic surveillance and follow-up are recommended for the Chinese CCS patients.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".