PhyloCorrelate: inferring bacterial gene–gene functional associations through large-scale phylogenetic profiling
Bibliographic record
Abstract
MOTIVATION: Statistical detection of co-occurring genes across genomes, known as 'phylogenetic profiling', is a powerful bioinformatic technique for inferring gene-gene functional associations. However, this can be a challenging task given the size and complexity of phylogenomic databases, difficulty in accounting for phylogenetic structure, inconsistencies in genome annotation and substantial computational requirements. RESULTS: We introduce PhyloCorrelate-a computational framework for gene co-occurrence analysis across large phylogenomic datasets. PhyloCorrelate implements a variety of co-occurrence metrics including standard correlation metrics and model-based metrics that account for phylogenetic history. By combining multiple metrics, we developed an optimized score that exhibits a superior ability to link genes with overlapping GO terms and KEGG pathways, enabling gene function prediction. Using genomic and functional annotation data from the Genome Taxonomy Database and AnnoTree, we performed all-by-all comparisons of gene occurrence profiles across the bacterial tree of life, totaling 154 217 052 comparisons for 28 315 genes across 27 372 bacterial genomes. All predictions are available in an online database, which instantaneously returns the top correlated genes for any PFAM, TIGRFAM or KEGG query. In total, PhyloCorrelate detected 29 762 high confidence associations between bacterial gene/protein pairs, and generated functional predictions for 834 DUFs and proteins of unknown function. AVAILABILITYAND IMPLEMENTATION: PhyloCorrelate is available as a web-server at phylocorrelate.uwaterloo.ca as well as an R package for analysis of custom datasets. We anticipate that PhyloCorrelate will be broadly useful as a tool for predicting function and interactions for gene families. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".