Dexamethasone vs. betamethasone for preterm birth: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective To compare the effectiveness and safety of dexamethasone versus betamethasone for preterm birth (registered in PROSPERO CRD42017078006). Search strategy We searched in MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, LILACS, Clinical Trials.gov, International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, reference lists and contacted field experts. Selection criteria, data collection and analysis Randomized controlled trials comparing any corticosteroids against each other or against placebo. Three researchers independently selected, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of the included studies by using EROS and COVIDENCE software. We performed a pairwise meta-analysis and Bayesian network meta-analysis. Main results We included 45 trials (11227 women, 11878 infants). There was no important difference between corticosteroids in neonatal death (odds ratio[OR] 1.05; 95% confidence interval 0.62-1.84; moderate-certainty evidence[CE]), neurodevelopmental disability (OR 1.03; 0.80-1.33; moderate-CE), intraventricular haemorrhage (OR 1.04; 0.56-1.78); low-CE) and birthweight (+5.29 gr; -49.79 to 58.97; high-CE). Compared with betamethasone, dexamethasone may reduce chorioamnionitis (OR 0.70; 0.45-1.06; moderate-CE), foetal death (OR 0.81; 0.24-2.41; low-CE) while may increase puerperal sepsis (OR 2.04; 0.72-6.06; low-CE) and respiratory distress syndrome (OR 1.34; 0.96-2.11; moderate-CE), however, the confidence interval indicates both beneficial and detrimental effects. Conclusions We found no important difference on neonatal death, neurodevelopmental disability, intraventricular haemorrhage and birthweight between corticosteroids. Compared with betamethasone, dexamethasone may reduce chorioamnionitis and foetal death, but may increase endometritis/puerperal sepsis and respiratory distress syndrome. Further research is warranted to improve the certainty of evidence. Keywords preterm birth, antenatal corticosteroids, dexamethasone, betamethasone, systematic review, network meta-analysis
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.022 | 0.045 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.026 | 0.040 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.008 | 0.007 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".