Cretaceous tectonics and gold mineralisation in the Otago Schist, New Zealand
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper provides a regional-scale background for understanding gold-mineralising processes in the Otago Schist during the Cretaceous. At this time the schist belt was in the latter stages of formation as an accretionary complex with 2000 km strike length on the Pacific margin of Gondwana. The Otago Schist is interpreted as an exhumed accretionary wedge of structurally stacked clastic metasedimentary rocks with minor metabasic rocks. Metamorphic grade reached upper greenschist facies. Gold and other related elements were mobilised from the metasedimentary rocks during metamorphism, and these elements contributed to the high levels of orogenic gold endowment (>18 million ounces in the schist belt. Mesozoic Gold deposits were emplaced in two distinct pulses, one at the beginning of the Early Cretaceous (~140-135 Ma) and the other at the end of the Early Cretaceous (~112-100 Ma). These mineralising pulses were driven by regional tectonic events that may have involved episodic underplating of subducting material, and/or subduction of spreading ridges. The earlier event was most closely associated with metamorphic processes that mobilised gold from the accreted metasediments during convergent tectonics, and appears to have been the more economically significant. The later event took place as accretionary processes ceased and the Zealandia portion of Gondwana began to undergo intracontinental rifting.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".