Association of Thoracic Computed Tomographic Measurements and Outcomes in Patients with Hematologic Malignancies Requiring Mechanical Ventilation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Rationale Patients with hematologic malignancies requiring mechanical ventilation have historically experienced poor outcomes. Objectives We aimed to determine whether body composition characteristics derived from thoracic computed tomographic (CT) imaging were associated with time to liberation from mechanical ventilation. Methods We evaluated mechanically ventilated patients with hematological malignancies admitted between 2014 and 2018. We included patients with thoracic CT imaging completed between 1 month before and 48 hours after intensive care unit (ICU) admission. We assessed the association of carinal skeletal muscle cross-sectional area (CSA), subcutaneous fat CSA, and fat index (fat/skeletal muscle ratio) with time to liberation from mechanical ventilation within 28 days. We accounted for the competing event of death within 28 days of mechanical ventilation. Results One hundred fifty-six patients were included; the mean age was 57 years (standard deviation 14) and 39% were female. Thirty-seven percent had received a hematopoietic stem cell transplant, and the median ratio of arterial oxygen tension/pressure to fraction of inspired oxygen was 134 mm Hg (interquartile range [IQR], 92–205). Median skeletal muscle CSA was 68 cm2 (IQR, 54–88) and subcutaneous fat CSA was 38 cm2 (IQR, 27–52). Forty-two percent of patients were liberated from mechanical ventilation within 28 days and 56% died in the ICU. Subcutaneous fat CSA (subdistribution hazard ratio [sHR], 0.81; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], −0.68 to 0.97) and fat index (sHR, 0.81; 95% CI, −0.68 to 0.97) were significantly associated with longer time to liberation from mechanical ventilation. Skeletal muscle CSA was not associated with time to liberation from ventilation (sHR, 1.08; 95% CI, −0.94 to 1.23). Conclusions Body composition measurements based on thoracic CT scans were associated with time to liberation from ventilation. These could represent novel surrogate markers of physical frailty in patients with hematologic malignancies receiving mechanical ventilation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".