12. Evaluation of Rapid Phenotypic Testing for KPC Carbapenemase Producing <i>klebsiella Pneumoniae</i> Directly from Positive Blood Cultures by Use of “Hot Chocolate” Plates
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background Invasive infections with Carbapenemase Producing Enterobacterales are associated with considerable morbidity and mortality, in part due to the risk of inappropriate empiric therapy. Consequently, the rapid identification of carbapenem resistance is crucial to the management of these infections. We sought to evaluate possible reductions in turnaround time to identification of this resistance in blood cultures growing these organisms by applying rapid phenotypic test kits to growth from “hot chocolate” plates. Methods 30 blood cultures, spiked with carbapenem resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates or susceptible controls, were inoculated onto chocolate agars that had pre-warmed at 37°C. These plates were incubated at 37ºC for 3.5 hours. The resulting minimal growth was then identified using MALDI-TOF and underwent rapid phenotypic testing using three commercially available products (β-lacta and β-carba, from Bio-Rad, Marnes-la-Coquette, France, and Carba-NP, from bioMérieux, Durham, NC). The time to identification of carbapenem resistance using this method was then compared to that of the conventional laboratory workup. Results The identification was 100% accurate to the species level using MALDI-TOF paired to the 3.5 hour growth on the “hot choocolate” plates. The β-lacta kit identified resistance to 3rd generation cephalosporins for all ESBL and carbapenemase producing Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates, while the β-carba and Carba-NP kits identified carbapenem resistance only in the carbapenemase producers. The sensitivity of all assays was 100% (95% CI 0.87–1.0) and the specificity of carbapenemase detection was 100% (97.5% one-sided CI 0.4–1.0). The corresponding sensitivities and specificities of direct disc diffusion for ertapenem resistance detection were 88.5% (95% CI 0.70–0.98) and 100% (95%CI 0.40–1.0) respectively. The turnaround time for the rapid kits coupled to the “hot chocolate” plates was 4.25 to 5.1 hours as compared to 16 hours for the conventional workup. Conclusion Rapid phenotypic tests performed after inoculation of “hot chocolate” plates are highly sensitive for the presence of carbapenemase production and can be incorporated into the laboratory workflow for Klebisella pneumoniae with important reductions in turnaround time. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".