MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3119108531 · doi:10.1093/ofid/ofaa439.140

95. Assess reasons for continuing antibiotics in persons with positive respiratory viruses PCR in the emergency room

2020· article· en· W3119108531 on OpenAlexaff
rawan kassar, nandini dandukuri, jean- Marc troquet, Charles Frenette

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen Forum Infectious Diseases · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRespiratory viral infections research
Canadian institutionsMcGill University Health CentreMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAntibioticsInternal medicineRespiratory tract infectionsAntimicrobial stewardshipPneumoniaIntensive care medicineRespiratory systemAntibiotic resistance

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Respiratory tract infections remain one of the major reasons for inappropriate antibiotic usage. The multiplex PCR respiratory viral panel improves the diagnostic ability of viral causes of RTI and have been advocated as a useful stewardship tool. We sought to evaluate factors leading to continued antibiotic following a positive respiratory viral PCR and to evaluate the impact of a targeted antimicrobial stewardship intervention on antibiotic use. Methods In this Quasi experimental study, adult patients presenting to RVH ER with positive respiratory PCR from January 13 2020 to February 27 2020 were reviewed. Patient demographics, clinical, comorbidities, laboratory and radiology reports, antibiotic and antiviral usage before and after test were recorded. For patients without microbiological or radiological evidence of bacterial infection, a standard questionnaire was administered to treating physician. Antibiotic prescribing rate before and following a positive PCR and antibiotic discontinuation following ASP questionnaire was tracked. Results During the study period, 147 adult patients presented to the ER with positive respiratory PCR were. Among the study population, antibiotic prescription rate was 49% prior to test result. Influenza was the most common respiratory virus isolated(89/147). Following the respiratory viral PCR, antibiotics were stopped 39% and continued in 51 % by the treating physician. Main reasons for antibiotic continuation included concurrent bacterial infection16/30 (pneumonia 9/30), COPD exacerbation 5/30, febrile neutropenia (5/30) and hemodynamic instability(4/30). Antibiotics were continued without obvious indications in 15 patients and were targeted for intervention. Overall 66% (10/15) of ASP interventions were accepted and antibiotics discontinued. Overall antibiotics were discontinued in 53 % of patients in whom they were initiated pretest result. Conclusion This study shows that positive respiratory virus PCR is very useful as it led to discontinuation of antibiotics by treating physician in 40 % and further 13% by an antibiotic stewardship intervention. Adding a stewardship intervention after test result further adds reduction to antibiotic usage. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.074
GPT teacher head0.382
Teacher spread0.308 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen Forum Infectious DiseasesSame topicRespiratory viral infections researchFrench-language works237,207