Drift waves enstrophy, zonal flow, and nonlinear evolution of the modulational instability
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The interaction of the drift wave (DW) turbulence and zonal flow (ZF) is investigated with the modified Hasegawa–Mima equation taking into account the backreaction of ZF velocity on DW turbulence. It is shown that the y-averaged enstrophy of DW turbulence and the velocity of ZF are intrinsically related. By utilizing this feature, a nonlinear stage of DW modulational instability is considered within the framework of the wave kinetic equation. It is shown that in this approximation, the nonlinear stage of the modulational instability results in the collapsing solutions, accompanied by the “wave breaking” phenomenon. Numerical simulations based on the Hasegawa–Mima equation show that for a weak DW turbulence, Φ̃=(eφ̃/Te) (Ln/ρs)⪝1, the collapsing-like features on both ZF and y-averaged enstrophy of DW turbulence decay in time and then re-emerge again at different locations. For the case of a strong DW turbulence, Φ̃>1, where nonlinear interactions of DW harmonics dominate, stable spatial structures of ZF and y-averaged enstrophy of DW turbulence emerge.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".