Short‐term hypoxia does not promote arrhythmia during voluntary apnea
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The presence of bradycardic arrhythmias during volitional apnea at altitude may be caused by chemoreflex activation/sensitization. We investigated whether bradyarrhythmic episodes became prevalent in apnea following short-term hypoxia exposure. Electrocardiograms (ECG; lead II) were collected from 22 low-altitude residents (F = 12; age=25 ± 5 years) at 671 m. Participants were exposed to normobaric hypoxia (SpO2 ~79 ± 3%) over a 5-h period. ECG rhythms were assessed during both free-breathing and maximal volitional end-expiratory and end-inspiratory apnea at baseline during normoxia and hypoxia exposure (20 min [AHX]; 5 h [HX5]). Free-breathing HR became elevated at AHX (78 ± 10 bpm; p < 0.0001) and HX5 (80 ± 12 bpm; p < 0.0001) compared to normoxia (68 ± 10 bpm), whereas apnea caused significant bradycardia at AHX (nadir end-expiratory −17 ± 14 bpm; p < 0.001) and HX5 (nadir end-expiratory −19 ± 15 bpm; p < 0.001), but not during normoxia (nadir end-expiratory −4 ± 13 bpm), with no difference in bradycardia responses between apneas at AHX and HX5. Conduction abnormalities were noted in five participants during normoxia (Premature Ventricular Contraction, Sinus Pause, Junctional Rhythm, Atrial Foci), which remained unchanged during apnea at AHX and HX5 (Premature Ventricular Contraction, Premature Atrial Contraction, Sinus Pause). End-inspiratory apneas were overall longer across conditions (normoxia p < 0.05; AHX p < 0.01; HX5 p < 0.001), with comparable HR responses to end-expiratory and fewer occurrences of arrhythmia. While short-term hypoxia is sufficient to elicit bradycardia during apnea, the occurrence of arrhythmias in response to apnea was not affected. These findings indicate that previously observed bradyarrhythmic events in untrained individuals at altitude only become prevalent following chronic hypoxia specificlly.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".