AN INVESTIGATION OF THE MECHANICAL, MICROSTRUCTURAL AND THERMO-MECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF COLLAGEN FILMS CROSS-LINKED WITH SMOKE CONDENSATE AND GLUTARALDEHYDE
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Collagen films were produced from five commercial collagen dispersions used for in-line sausage co-extrusion production. Films were prepared by partially dehydrating in a salt solution (30%) and crossed linked with smoke condensate (15%) or glutaraldehyde (GA; 0-1%). Both treatments increased the tensile strength (0.32 to 0.91 MPa) and reduced % elongation while differences among the dispersions were observed. Overall, % elongation generally decreased with a higher degree of cross linking. Transmission electron micrographs revealed that collagen fibers were swollen to varying degrees, likely influencing the mechanical behaviours. Protein concentration affected the transparency of the films with a difference of 100% in light transmission between the clearest and most opaque film studied. Cross-linking with GA appeared to thermally stabilize films up to 800C. Aldehydes in the smoke condensate were identified by gas chromatography showing highest concentration of benzaldehyde, 4-hydroxy-3,5-dimethoxy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".