A large genome with chromosome‐scale assembly sheds light on the evolutionary success of a true toad (<i>Bufo gargarizans</i>)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract We present a high‐quality genome assembly for the Asiatic toad (Bufo gargarizans) and explore the evolution of several large gene families in amphibians. With a large genome assembly size of 4.55 Gb, the chromosome‐scale assembly includes 747 scaffolds with an N50 of 539.8 Mb and 1.79% gaps. Long terminal repeats (LTRs) constitute a high proportion of the genome and their expansion is a key contributor to the inflated genome size in this species. This is very different from other small amphibian genomes, but similar to that of the enormous axolotl genome. The genome retains a large number of duplicated genes, with tandem (TD) and proximal duplications (PD) the predominant mode of duplication. A total of 122 gene families have undergone significant expansion and were mainly enriched in sensory perception of smell and bitter taste. The CYP2C subfamily, which plays an important role in metabolic detoxification, specifically expanded via TD and PD in the Asiatic toad and the cane toad (true toads). Most of Na+/K+‐ATPase genes experienced accelerated evolution along Bufonid lineages and two amino acid sites involving toad‐toxin resistance were found to experience positive selection. We also revealed a dynamic evolution of olfactory and vomeronasal receptor gene families which was likely driven by the water‐to‐land transition. The high‐quality genome of the Asiatic toad will provide a solid foundation to understand the genetic basis of its many biological processes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".