Backscattering in antiresonant hollow-core fibers: over 40 dB lower than in standard optical fibers
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The elastic backscattering of light in optical fiber is a fundamental phenomenon that sets the ultimate performance of several fiber systems such as gyroscopes and bidirectional transfer links. Until now, efforts to reduce the backscattering coefficient have yielded limited results, with the lowest value sitting at around − 76 d B / m in Ge-free silica-core fiber at 1.55 µm. Here, we present what we believe to be the first measurement of backscattering from a low-loss antiresonant hollow-core fiber and show that it is more than 40 dB below reported values in silica-core fiber and hollow-core photonic bandgap fiber. The record-low level of − 118 d B / m measured with our custom-built optical frequency-domain reflectometer is in good agreement with simulations in which we assume the scattering to originate from the intrinsic surface roughness. Our demonstration also shows that a tailored instrument can localize and quantify weak faults within a hollow-core fiber, enabling its detailed characterization.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".