Draft Genome Resources for Plant-Beneficial Fungi <i>Clonostachys rosea</i> Strains ACM941 and 88-710
Bibliographic record
Abstract
strains ACM941 and 88-710 are beneficial microbes recognized for their plant disease control and growth promotion properties, respectively, when applied to economically important crops. In addition to their geographical and functional overlap, the two strains also share a high degree of genetic similarity. In an effort to identify the subtleties that underlie their strain-specific applications, their genomic sequence is reported here. The genome size of ACM941 was estimated to be 56.9 Mb, encoding 17,585 putative genes, while strain 88-710 was estimated to have a 55.5 Mb genome size, containing 17,188 predicted genes. Overall, ACM941 and 88-710 share >96% of their encoded genomes, such that their strain-specific characteristics are likely encoded in either the remaining variable 4% or differentially regulated shared genes or both. These genomic sequences form a foundation for future studies aimed at identifying the genomic and metabolic machinery driving their respective beneficial properties.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.006 | 0.008 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.034 | 0.031 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".