MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3119926766 · doi:10.1016/j.ocarto.2020.100132

Applying the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health to understand osteoarthritis management in urban and rural community-dwelling seniors

2021· article· en· W3119926766 on OpenAlex
Shabana Amanda Ali, Karen Lee, Joy C. MacDermid

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueOsteoarthritis and Cartilage Open · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOsteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsSt Joseph's Health CentreWestern University
FundersWestern University
KeywordsInternational Classification of Functioning, Disability and HealthBiopsychosocial modelFacilitatorQualitative researchContent analysisOsteoarthritisGerontologyPsychologyMedicinePhysical therapyAlternative medicineSociologySocial psychologyPathologyPsychiatryRehabilitation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objectives: The objectives of this study were to identify contextual factors as barriers or facilitators of osteoarthritis management in urban- and rural-dwelling seniors by applying the World Health Organization's International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). Design: Secondary analysis was performed on interview transcripts from urban- (n ​= ​11) and rural-dwelling (n ​= ​9) seniors living with osteoarthritis in Canada. Meaningful concepts were linked to ICF codes (Environmental Factors) according to established linking rules. Unclassified content (including Personal Factors) was subjected to qualitative content analysis. Results: A total of 481 and 410 meaningful concepts were identified in interview transcripts from urban and rural groups, respectively. For Environmental Factors, the majority of meaningful concepts linked to "Environmental Factors", then "Activities and Participation", and then "Body Functions" in the ICF. The most frequently linked codes were "e355 Health professionals", "e5801 Health systems", "e5800 Health services", and "e398 Support and relationships, other specified". The most salient barrier and facilitator to osteoarthritis management reflected in our results were "e5801 Health systems" and "e398 Support and relationships, other specified", respectively, for both urban and rural groups. For Personal Factors, qualitative content analysis of unclassified content revealed 3 key themes including (1) Coping Strategies; (2) Age of Osteoarthritis Diagnosis; and (3) Individual Circumstances. Conclusion: Beyond physical limitations, community-dwelling seniors with osteoarthritis encounter a wide range of biopsychosocial factors that can impact disease management. Applying the ICF, we identify "Environmental Factors" as a significant contextual factor impacting osteoarthritis management in both urban and rural communities.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.895
Threshold uncertainty score0.589

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.300
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it