Simulating Effective QED on Quantum Computers
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In recent years simulations of chemistry and condensed materials has emerged as one of the preeminent applications of quantum computing, offering an exponential speedup for the solution of the electronic structure for certain strongly correlated electronic systems. To date, most treatments have ignored the question of whether relativistic effects, which are described most generally by quantum electrodynamics (QED), can also be simulated on a quantum computer in polynomial time. Here we show that effective QED, which is equivalent to QED to second order in perturbation theory, can be simulated in polynomial time under reasonable assumptions while properly treating all four components of the wavefunction of the fermionic field. In particular, we provide a detailed analysis of such simulations in position and momentum basis using Trotter-Suzuki formulas. We find that the number of <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math>-gates needed to perform such simulations on a <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mn>3</mml:mn><mml:mi>D</mml:mi></mml:math> lattice of <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi>s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math> sites scales at worst as <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mi>O</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mn>3</mml:mn></mml:msubsup><mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mi>&#x03F5;</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"><mml:mn>1</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi>o</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:mn>1</mml:mn><mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math> in the thermodynamic limit for position basis simulations and <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mi>O</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"><mml:mn>4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn>2</mml:mn><mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mn>3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mi>&#x03F5;</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"><mml:mn>1</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi>o</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:mn>1</mml:mn><mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math> in momentum basis. We also find that qubitization scales slightly better with a worst case scaling of <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"><mml:mover><mml:mi>O</mml:mi><mml:mo>&#x007E;</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"><mml:mn>2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn>2</mml:mn><mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mn>3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mi>&#x03F5;</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo></mml:math> for lattice eQED and complications in the prepare circuit leads to a slightly worse scaling in momentum basis of <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"><mml:mover><mml:mi>O</mml:mi><mml:mo>&#x007E;</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"><mml:mn>5</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn>2</mml:mn><mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mn>3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mi>&#x03F5;</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo></mml:math>. We further provide concrete gate counts for simulating a relativistic version of the uniform electron gas that show challenging problems can be simulated using fewer than <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:msup><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math> non-Clifford operations and also provide a detailed discussion of how to prepare multi-reference configuration interaction states in effective QED which can provide a reasonable initial guess for the ground state. Finally, we estimate the planewave cutoffs needed to accurately simulate heavy elements such as gold.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.007 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".