Sea High-Level Determination using Pseudorange Range Difference of Carrier Phase and Code between GPS Reflection and Directly Signal
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The GNSS signal reflection technique at the tide station can provide accurate results and is more far-reaching from the coast to the sea, it is possible to provide real-time sealevel information including high wave and tsunami. With the use of two receivers with two antennas, one facing upwards as a direct signal receiver and a second antenna facing downwards as a signal receiver of reflection can be obtained both phase data and GNSS signal codes from both direct and reflected signals. With the different methods of signal trajectory that propagates directly and propagates through reflection by sea level, it can be determined the difference in distance between the master and the shadow rover receivers. The sea level can be determined which is half the distance between the two receivers. In this paper, the results of the data analysis of the different trajectory distances of GNSS signals from code data are presented, from the simplest one, namely a GNSS satellite is assumed to have a linear relationship with the satellite elevation angle with a gradient proportional to sea level. The computation results show that the reflected signal data is suspected not only from sea level but originating from the surrounding environment. It is necessary to experiment with the reflected signal in an area that ensures that the signal is only reflected once by sea level or other reflected plane.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".