Solutions of the Ginzburg–Landau equations with vorticity concentrating near a nondegenerate geodesic
Bibliographic record
Abstract
It is well-known that under suitable hypotheses, for a sequence of solutions of the (simplified) Ginzburg–Landau equations -\Delta u_{\varepsilon} +\varepsilon^{-2}(|u_{\varepsilon}|^{2}-1)u_{\varepsilon} = 0 , the energy and vorticity concentrate as \varepsilon\to 0 around a codimension 2 stationary varifold – a (measure-theoretic) minimal surface. Much less is known about the question of whether, given a codimension 2 minimal surface, there exists a sequence of solutions for which the given minimal surface is the limiting concentration set. The corresponding question is very well-understood for minimal hypersurfaces and the scalar Allen–Cahn equation, and for the Ginzburg–Landau equations when the minimal surface is locally area-minimizing, but otherwise quite open. We consider this question on a 3 -dimensional closed Riemannian manifold (M,g) , and we prove that any embedded nondegenerate closed geodesic can be realized as the asymptotic energy/ vorticity concentration set of a sequence of solutions of the Ginzburg–Landau equations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".