MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3120230516 · doi:10.1364/ol.413763

Ultra-low frequency dynamic strain detection with laser frequency drifting compensation based on a random fiber grating array

2021· article· en· W3120230516 on OpenAlexafffund
Yuan Wang, Ping Lü, Stephen J. Mihailov, Liang Chen, Xiaoyi Bao

Bibliographic record

VenueOptics Letters · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Fiber Optic Sensors
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council CanadaUniversity of Ottawa
FundersChina Scholarship CouncilNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Research Chairs
KeywordsOpticsFiber Bragg gratingFiber laserMaterials scienceOptical fiberLaserGratingSpatial frequencyCompensation (psychology)Physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dynamic strain sensing over a frequency range from 0.01 to 20 Hz can be used for monitoring earthquakes and volcanoes, charting rock and petroleum formations beneath the earth. However, significant laser frequency drifting (LFD) has limited the detection in this frequency range, especially for distributed frequency detection with phase optical time domain reflectometry (OTDR), where the LFD will introduce a time dependent noise destroying the dynamic strain reconstruction. In this study, a simple and effective method that utilizes the referenced random fiber grating to monitor the variation of laser frequency has been both theoretically analyzed and experimentally demonstrated. During the maximum up to 200 s data acquisition time, the frequency variation of a distributed feedback (DFB) laser with MHz linewidth is obtained from the referenced portion of sensing signal, and then the 1 Hz and 0.01 Hz dynamic strain variations with amplitude of 30 µ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <mml:mtext>ε</mml:mtext> </mml:math> are reconstructed with strain measurement standard deviation of 66 n <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <mml:mtext>ε</mml:mtext> </mml:math> . Due to signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) enhanced Rayleigh traces from random fiber gratings, a minimum detectable frequency drifting of 7.28 MHz could be achieved over the optical frequency of <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"> <mml:mn>2</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> <mml:mo>×</mml:mo> <mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"> <mml:msup> <mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"> <mml:mn>10</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"> <mml:mn>14</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:msup> </mml:mrow> <mml:mspace width="thickmathspace"/> <mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"> <mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi> <mml:mi mathvariant="normal">z</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.208
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.193
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations23
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOptics LettersSame topicAdvanced Fiber Optic SensorsFrench-language works237,207