MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3120307736 · doi:10.30659/pondasi.v25i1.13036

STUDI LITERATUR : PERAN MASYARAKAT TERHADAP KONSERVASI HUTAN

2020· article· en· W3120307736 on OpenAlexaff
Boby Rahman, Astri Pratiwi, Sania Fitri Sa’idah

Bibliographic record

VenuePondasi · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCommunity-based Tourism Development and Sustainability
Canadian institutionsEncana (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsForestryGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

AbstractOne of the efforts to conserve resources is to link local community wisdom to sustainable forest conservation. The study was conducted to figure out how local communities' prudence relates to the conservation of forest areas. Conservation is an effort to preserve or manage sustainable forests such as traditional customs that have the trust to protect forests. This is because people’s role is vital to the management of forest areas. The study was done with a purpose (1) to find out how local prudence relates to the conservation of forest areas, (2) to see how people are involved in forest conservation, (3) to see what the cultural condition of local communities is. It is to hope that the areas of the forest will be preserved and that the awareness of communities in the importance of keeping properly.Keywords: Culture, Forest Conservation, Community Role AbstrakSalah satu upaya konservasi sumber daya adalah dengan mengkaitkan kearifan lokal masyarakat dalam pelestarian hutan yang berkelanjutan. Penelitian ini dilakukan dengan tujuan untuk mengetahui bagaimana kaitan antara kearifan lokal masyarakat terhadap konservasi kawasan hutan. Konservasi merupakan suatu upaya pelestarian atau pengelolaan suatu wilayah yang berkelanjutan. Salah satu upaya dari konservasi hutan adalah dengan mengkaitkan kearifan lokal masyarakat dalam pelestarian hutan yang berkelanjutan seperti adat istiadat yang memiliki kepercayaan untuk melindungi hutan. Hal ini dikarenakan peran masyarakat sangatlah penting dalam pengelolaan kawasan hutan. Penelitian ini dilakukan dengan tujuan (1) untuk mengetahui bagaimana kaitan antara kearifan lokal terhadap konservasi kawasan hutan, (2) mengetahui bagaimana peran masyarakat terhadap konservasi hutan, (3) untuk mengetahui bagaimana kondisi kebudayaan masyarakat lokal. Adanya upaya-upaya tersebut dapat diharapkan kawasan hutan akan terjaga kelestariannya dan adanya kesadaran dalam masyarakat akan pentingnya menjaga hutan dengan baik.Kata Kunci: Kebudayaan, Konservasi Hutan, Peran Masyarakat

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.032
Threshold uncertainty score0.107

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.003
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0320.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.306
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePondasiSame topicCommunity-based Tourism Development and SustainabilityFrench-language works237,207