862. Impact of Caregiver Health on Pediatric Healthcare-Associated Viral Respiratory Infections (HAVRIs): A Retrospective Study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background The burden of healthcare-associated viral respiratory infections (HAVRIs) in children is significant, with increased healthcare costs and risk of poor outcomes. However, while healthcare workers are the main target of infection prevention measures, little is known about the impact of sick contacts during hospitalization on the incidence of HAVRIs. The objective of our study was to determine the proportion of pediatric HAVRIs following contact with an ill caregiver or visitor. Secondary objectives were to describe the characteristics of affected patients as well as the complications associated with the HAVRI episodes. Methods This is a retrospective chart review that took place in a pediatric tertiary care center with both multiple and single-bed rooms. All cases of HAVRIs that occurred between December 2017 and July 2019 in patients aged less than 18 years old were included in the study. HAVRIs were defined as a laboratory confirmed respiratory viral illness occurring after 72 hours of admission. Results Forty-four HAVRIs were included in the analysis. The majority (n=32, 72.7%) were among patients aged less than 24 months. Only 2 patients had no comorbidities and almost half (n=21, 47.7%) had multiple complex medical conditions. Rhinovirus was the most frequently isolated virus (n=20, 45.5%). Nine patients (20.5%) had a documented contact with a sick caregiver (n=8, 88.9%) or sick visitor (n=2, 22.2%) in the 7 days prior to the onset of new respiratory symptoms and subsequent HAVRI diagnosis. In the 72 hours prior to HAVRI onset, 18 patients (40.9%) were in a single-bed room and 6 patients (13.6%) were already under droplet/contact precautions. Twelve patients (27.3%) had new or increased O2 requirements and 4 (9.1%) were transferred to the intensive care unit. There were no associated deaths. Conclusion Our study suggests that having a contact with a sick caregiver or visitor is a potential risk factor for acquiring a HAVRI. This reinforces the relevance of a strict visitor-screening policy and of educating caregivers on the importance of appropriate hand hygiene when caring for their child. Of note, more than one third of HAVRI cases occurred in patients already in a single-bed room, with or without additional precautions, suggesting that those measures are not entirely protective. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".