MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3121149335

Percepción del dolor medido con el instrumento McGill en pacientes trasplantados de médula ósea tipo alogénico en la Clínica de Marly Bogotá, en la Unidad de Trasplante de Médula Ósea en un trimestre del año 2020

2020· article· es· W3121149335 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Maira Alejandra Anacona Varela, Diana Lorena Jiménez Ballesteros, María Paula Montenegro Gómez

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldMedicine
TopicPain Management and Opioid Use
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineTransplantationObservational studyMcGill Pain QuestionnairePhysical therapySurgeryInternal medicineVisual analogue scale
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Pain is considered an unpleasant sensitive and emotional experience that can be associated with tissue lesions or potential damage; it prevails in all stages and stages of the disease in cancer patients affecting the different dimensions of the individual reflected in a negative impact on the patient's quality of life. In the case of patients who have undergone hematopoietic cell transplantation, pain is the most prevalent symptom due to high-intensity cytotoxic treatment; it leads to a negative state in each of the transplantation stages affecting their peace of mind and recovery. In order to obtain the description of pain perception in allogeneic-type hematopoietic cell transplantation patients, we conducted a descriptive observational study measured in two steps at the transplantation unit of Marly clinic. METHOD: The present observational design of a descriptive cohort, which measured pain using the McGill scale in allogeneic-type hematopoietic cell transplantation patients at day - 1 conditioning and day + 9 post-transplantation. For quantitative variables, summary measures such as median with interquartile range and mean with standard deviation were presented according to their measurement scale. In order to present the perception of pain on the day of conditioning -1 and post-transplantation +9, given the nature of the variable, frequencies RESULTS: 10 patients were recruited between August and October, in the -1 day of conditioning none of the participants reported pain unlike the +9 day post transplant was found that 6 (60%) manifest pain. According to the descriptors of the McGill scale, patients described pain in the sensory category pulsating-shearing at 6 (60.0%), trigger-sensitive at 5 (50.0%), as a tingling cramp at 4 (40.0%) and in the affective category fastidious at 8 (80%), exasperating - depressing at 6 (60.0%), suffocating at 5 (50.0%). The factors associated with pain in day -1 did not present alteration while in day +9 sleep was affected in 6 (60%) and decrease in daily activity in 4 (40%). Of the symptoms accompanying the pain on day -1, 30 (30%) reported nausea, while on day +9, nausea was present in 1 (10%). The intensity of the pain was observed that on day -1 only 1 (10%) participant reported mild pain, the remaining 90% of the participants did not present pain, unlike on day +9, which reported moderate to intense pain in 9 (90%). Of the 10 patients, 6 (60%) were treated for pain. CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed that the patient who underwent transplantation of allogeneic type hematopoietic cells with haploidin compatibility manifested pain on day +9 post-transplantation due to toxic complications secondary to conditioning, with both sensory and affective component. Translated with www.DeepL.com/Translator (free version)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.030
Threshold uncertainty score0.059

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPain Management and Opioid UseFrench-language works237,207