MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3121199072 · doi:10.1088/1361-6382/ac1083

Neutron stars in the effective fly-by framework: f-mode re-summation

2021· article· en· W3121199072 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueClassical and Quantum Gravity · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicPulsars and Gravitational Waves Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersDivision of PhysicsCanadian Institute for Advanced ResearchNational Science Foundation
KeywordsGravitational waveNeutron starEccentricity (behavior)HarmonicsAmplitudeOrbital eccentricityHarmonicSpherical harmonicsOrbital elements

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Eccentric compact binaries pose not only a challenge for gravitational wave (GW) detectors, but also provide a probe into the nuclear equation of state if one of the objects is a neutron star. At the short pericenter passage, tidal interactions excite f-modes on the star, which in turn emit their own GWs. We derive an analytic waveform for these stellar oscillations within the effective fly-by framework, modeling the emission to leading post-Newtonian order. At this order, the f-mode response can be written in a Fourier decomposition in terms of orbital harmonics, with the amplitudes of each harmonic depending on Hansen coefficients. Re-summing the harmonics of the f-mode results in a simple decaying harmonic oscillator, with the amplitude now determined by a Hansen coefficient of complex harmonic number. We compute the match between the re-summed f-mode and numerical integrations of the tidal response, and find <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mi mathvariant="script">M</mml:mi> <mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo> <mml:mn>0.98</mml:mn> </mml:math> for systems with high orbital eccentricity ( e &gt; 0.8) and low semi-latus rectum ( p &lt; 15 M ) for three equations of state. We further compare our model to modes generated from subsequent pericenter passages under the effect of radiation reaction, and develop an accurate model to time pericenter passages. We show how the timing model can be used to specify initial conditions to accurate track the f-mode excitation across multiple pericenter passages.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.292
Threshold uncertainty score0.342

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.337
Teacher spread0.324 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClassical and Quantum GravitySame topicPulsars and Gravitational Waves ResearchFrench-language works237,207