MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3121571598 · doi:10.1002/hlca.202000214

Probing BRD Inhibition Substituent Effects in Bulky Analogues of (+)‐JQ1

2021· article· en· W3121571598 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Storm Hassell‐Hart, S. Picaud, Raphael Lengacher, Joshua Csucker, Régis Millet, Gilles Gasser, Roger Alberto, Hannah J. Maple, Robert Felix, Zbigniew J. Leśnikowski, Helen Stewart, Timothy Chevassut, Simon Morley, P. Filippakopoulos, John Spencer

Bibliographic record

VenueHelvetica Chimica Acta · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicProtein Degradation and Inhibitors
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersMedical Research CouncilFundação de Apoio à Pesquisa do Distrito FederalEngineering and Physical Sciences Research CouncilCoordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível SuperiorDiamond Light SourceSchweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen ForschungAgence Nationale de la RechercheConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e TecnológicoOntario Ministry of Economic Development and Innovation
KeywordsChemistryAcetamideBromodomainCocrystalSubstituentSelectivityStereochemistryPotencyProtonationMedicinal chemistryIn vitroBiochemistryMoleculeOrganic chemistryHydrogen bondHistone

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract A series of bulky organometallic and organic analogues of the bromodomain (BRD) inhibitor (+)‐JQ1 have been prepared. The most potent, N ‐[(adamantan‐1‐yl)methyl]‐2‐[(9 S )‐7‐(4‐chlorophenyl)‐4,5,13‐trimethyl‐3‐thia‐1,8,11,12‐tetraazatricyclo[8.3.0.02,6]trideca‐2(6),4,7,10,12‐pentaen‐9‐yl]acetamide, 2e , showed excellent potency with an K D = ca . 130 n m vs . BRD4(1) and a ca . 2‐fold selectivity over BRD4(2) ( K D = ca . 260 n m ). Its binding to the first bromodomain of BRD4 was determined by a protein cocrystal structure.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.512

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHelvetica Chimica ActaSame topicProtein Degradation and InhibitorsFrench-language works237,207