MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3121621861

Institutional Entrepreneurship in Mature Fields: The Big Five Accounting Firms

2005· article· en· W3121621861 on OpenAlex
Royston Greenwood, Roy Suddaby

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueSSRN Electronic Journal · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicBusiness Strategy and Innovation
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEntrepreneurshipAgency (philosophy)DialecticContext (archaeology)EliteActor–network theoryOrganizational theoryInstitutional theoryProcess (computing)Field (mathematics)Principal–agent problemInstitutional changeAccountingBusinessEconomic geographySociologyManagementPolitical scienceEconomicsCorporate governanceEpistemologySocial sciencePublic administrationGeography
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study examines change initiated from the center of mature organizational fields. As such, it addresses the paradox of embedded agency—that is, the paradox of how actors enact changes to the context by which they, as actors, are shaped. The change examined is the introduction of a new organizational form. Combining network loca-tion theory and dialectical theory, we identify four dynamics that form a process model of elite institutional entrepreneurship. Institutional theory initially focused upon ex-plaining how institutionalized structures of mean-ing affect organizational processes. Attention was given to the conforming behavior of organizations, the adoption of a limited range of socially approved organizational templates, and the resilience of in-stitutional prescriptions (Tolbert & Zucker, 1996; Scott, 2001). More recently, institutional entrepre-neurship and change have become the phenome-

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.201
Threshold uncertainty score0.735

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it