Effects of dietary amino acid density and exogenous protease inclusion on growth performance and apparent ileal amino acid digestibility in poultry
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Two experiments were conducted to evaluate the effects of dietary amino acid density and exogenous protease inclusion on growth performance and amino acid digestibility in poultry. In experiment 1, Cobb 500 broiler chicks (n = 480) were fed to 21 d of age. Treatments were arranged as a 2 × 4 factorial design with main effects of commercial protease (with or without) and amino acid density which corresponded to approximately 95, 97.5, 100, or 102.5% of breeder recommendations for digestible Lys. In experiment 2, hybrid turkey poults (n = 780) were fed diets formulated to provide low or adequate amino acid density (approximately 91 and 100% of the NRC-recommended requirement for digestible Lys, respectively) with each diet being fed with or without an exogenous protease. Poults received experimental diets from day 1 to 42 of age. Growth performance metrics were calculated from pen weights and feed consumption recorded throughout each experiment, and digestibility data were obtained from analysis of ileal contents. Data were analyzed using SAS 9.4 with pen as the experimental unit and pen location as the blocking factor. Results of these experiments demonstrated broilers fed 1.12 and 1.21% digestible Lys diets with added protease had a 2-point improvement in feed conversion ratio (FCR) compared with chicks fed these diets without protease. Increasing amino acid density improved FCR in broilers and poults and improved BW, ADG, and ADFI in poults. There was no evidence that added protease had an effect on BW, ADG, or ADFI in broilers or poults. Finally, ileal amino acid digestibility was not affected by amino acid density or protease inclusion for either 20-day-old broiler chicks or 42-day-old turkey poults.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".