Beyond <i>BRCA</i>? clinical utility of homologous recombination deficiency in gastrointestinal cancers.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
472 Background: There is emerging evidence about the predictive role of homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) in multiple cancers. The clinical utility of HRD is less well defined in gastrointestinal (GI) malignancies. Methods: We reviewed the whole genome (WGS) and transcriptomic (RNA-Seq) data of patients with advanced GI cancers between 2012-2018 in the Personalized Oncogenomics trial (NCT02155621). Scores were calculated as the sum of loss of heterozygosity, telomeric allelic imbalance, and large-scale state transitions scores. HRD was defined as a score ≥34. Mutational analysis was performed to determine the presence of mutational signature 3, which is usually strongly associated with BRCA status. Retrospective chart review was conducted to extract treatment and survival outcomes. Overall survival (OS) from initiation of first-line systemic therapy and time to progression on platinum therapy (TTPp) were calculated. Linear and multivariable regression analyses were conducted. Results: Of 154 patients with GI primaries, 56% were male and 105 (68%) were exposed to a platinum agent in the metastatic setting. Primary sites included upper GI (N=20, 9%), pancreas (N=35, 16%), colorectal (N=74, 33%), and other GI primary (N=25, 11%). Ten patients (6%) had a BRCA1/2 mutation, 20 (13%) had a high HRD score, and 11 (7%) had a high signature 3 score (>0.05). Six patients had both high HRD and high signature 3 scores (Table). On linear regression, high HRD scores and mutational signature 3 were independently associated with longer TTPp (β=4.17, 95% CI 0.15-8.19, p=0.04; β=8.03, 95% CI 2.87-13.18, p<0.05, respectively). On multivariable linear regression, after adjusting for HRD score, BRCA1/2 status, and tumor site, only cases with a mutational signature 3 retained significance ( p<0.05). HRD status was not prognostic for OS (HR 1.02, 95% CI 0.65-1.62, p=0.92). Conclusions: Within a cohort of patients with GI malignancies characterized by WGS and RNA-Seq, mutational signature 3 was more strongly associated with TTPp compared to HRD score. These data highlight potential predictive implications of Signature 3 to complement HRD and BRCA status in identifying patients who may benefit from exposure to platinum therapy. [Table: see text]
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".