MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3121796360 · doi:10.1088/0954-3899/39/7/075001

A Large Hadron Electron Collider at CERN Report on the Physics and Design Concepts for Machine and Detector

2012· article· en· W3121796360 on OpenAlexaff
J. L. Abelleira Fernandez, C. Adolphsen, A N Akay, H. Aksakal, Javier L. Albacete, S. Alekhin, P. P. Allport, V. Andreev, R B Appleby, E Arikan, N. Armesto, G. Azuelos, M. Bai, D C Barber, J. Bartels, O Behnke, J. Behr, A. Belyaev, I. Ben‐Zvi, N. R. Bernard, S. Bertolucci, S. Bettoni, Sudhansu S. Biswal, J. Blümlein, H. Böttcher, Alex Bogacz, Chiara Bracco, O. Brandt, H. M. Braun, Stanley J. Brodsky, O Brüning, E. Bulyak, A. Buniatyan, H. Bürkhardt, I. Turk Cakir, Ö. Çakır, R. Calaga, V. Çetinkaya, E. Ciapala, R. Çiftçi, A. K. Çiftçi, B. A. Cole, John C. Collins, O. Dadoun, John Dainton, A. De Roeck, D. d’Enterria, A. Dudarev, Å. Eide, Rikard Enberg, Emre Eroğlu, K. Eskola, L. Favart, M. Fitterer, Stefano Forte, A. Gaddi, Paolo Gambino, Héctor García Morales, T. Gehrmann, P. Gladkikh, C. Glasman, R. Godbole, B. Goddard, T. Greenshaw, Alberto Guffanti, V. Guzey, C. Gwenlan, Tao Han, Yue Hao, F. Haug, W. Herr, A. Hervé, B. J. Holzer, M. Ishitsuka, Michel Jacquet, B. Jeanneret, J. M. Jimenez, J. M. Jowett, H. Jung, H. Karadeniz, D. Kayran, A. I. Kilić, K. Kimura, M. Klein, U. Klein, T. Kluge, F. Kocak, M. Korostelev, A. Kosmicki, P. Kostka, H. Kowalski, Günter Krämer, D. Küchler, M. Kuze, T. Lappi, P. Laycock, E. Levichev, S. Levonian, Vladimir Litvinenko, Alessandra Lombardi, J. Maeda, Cyrille Marquet, B Mellado, K.H. Mess, Attilio Milanese, S. Moch, И. И. Морозов, Y. Muttoni, S. Myers, Soumitra Nandi, Z. Nergiz, P. R. Newman, T. Omori, James Osborne, E. Paoloni, Y. Papaphilippou, C. Pascaud, Hannu Paukkunen, E Perez, Tatiana Pieloni, E. Pilicer, B. Pire, R. Plačakytė, A. Polini, V. Ptitsyn, Y. Pupkov, V. Radescu, Sreerup Raychaudhuri, L. Rinolfi, R. Rohini, Juan Rojo, S. Russenschuck, M. Ö. Sahin, Carlos A. Salgado, K. Sampei, R Sassot, E. Sauvan, U. Schneekloth, T. Schörner-Sadenius, Daniel Schulte, A. Şenol, A. Seryi, P. Sievers, A.N. Skrinsky, W. H. Smith, H Spiesberger, A. M. Staśto, M. Strikman, M. K. Sullivan, S. Sultansoy, Yong Sun, B. Surrow, L. Szymanowski, Pieter Taels, I. Tapan, T. Tasci, E. ̃Tassi, H. Ten Kate, J. Terrón, H. Thiesen, L. Thompson, K. Tokushuku, R Tomás García, D. Tommasini, D. Trbojević, N. Tsoupas, Joachim Tückmantel, Ş. Türköz, T.N. Trinh, Konrad Tywoniuk, G Unel, J. Urakawa, P. Vanmechelen, A. Variola, R. Veness, A. Vivoli, P Vobly, J. Wagner, R. Wallny, S. Wallon, G. Watt, C. Weiss, U. A. Wiedemann, U. Wienands, F. Willeke, V. Yakimenko, A. F. Żarnecki, Z Zhang, F. Zimmermann, R. Žlebčík, F. Zomer

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Physics G Nuclear and Particle Physics · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicParticle physics theoretical and experimental studies
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalTRIUMF
FundersBasic Energy SciencesOffice of ScienceScience and Technology Facilities CouncilXunta de GaliciaTürkiye Atom Enerjisi KurumuAlfred P. Sloan FoundationU.S. Department of Energy
KeywordsLarge Hadron ColliderPhysicsParticle physicsDetectorNuclear physicsColliderElectronHadronOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The physics programme and the design are described of a new collider for particle and nuclear physics, the Large Hadron Electron Collider (LHeC), in which a newly built electron beam of 60 GeV, to possibly 140 GeV, energy collides with the intense hadron beams of the LHC. Compared to the first ep collider, HERA, the kinematic range covered is extended by a factor of twenty in the negative four-momentum squared, Q2 , and in the inverse Bjorken x, while with the design luminosity of 1033 cm-2 s-1 the LHeC is projected to exceed the integrated HERA luminosity by two orders of magnitude. The physics programme is devoted to an exploration of the energy frontier, complementing the LHC and its discovery potential for physics beyond the Standard Model with high precision deep inelastic scattering measurements. These are designed to investigate a variety of fundamental questions in strong and electroweak interactions. The LHeC thus continues the path of deep inelastic scattering (DIS) into unknown areas of physics and kinematics. The physics programme also includes electron-deuteron and electron-ion scattering in a (Q 21/x) range extended by four orders of magnitude as compared to previous lepton-nucleus DIS experiments for novel investigations of neutron's and nuclear structure, the initial conditions of Quark-Gluon Plasma formation and further quantum chromodynamic phenomena. The LHeC may be realised either as a ring-ring or as a linac-ring collider. Optics and beam dynamics studies are presented for both versions, along with technical design considerations on the interaction region, magnets including new dipole prototypes, cryogenics, RF, and further components. A design study is also presented of a detector suitable to perform high precision DIS measurements in a wide range of acceptance using state-of-the art detector technology, which is modular and of limited size enabling its fast installation. The detector includes tagging devices for electron, photon, proton and neutron detection near to the beam pipe. Civil engineering and installation studies are presented for the accelerator and the detector. The LHeC can be built within a decade and thus be operated while the LHC runs in its high-luminosity phase. It so represents a major opportunity for progress in particle physics exploiting the investment made in the LHC.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.066

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0200.008

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.289
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations642
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Physics G Nuclear and Particle PhysicsSame topicParticle physics theoretical and experimental studiesFrench-language works237,207