MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3121826552 · doi:10.1113/ep089088

<i>SCN5A</i>‐C683R exhibits combined gain‐of‐function and loss‐of‐function properties related to adrenaline‐triggered ventricular arrhythmia

2021· article· en· W3121826552 on OpenAlexaff
Christian Steinberg, Sylvie Pilote, François Philippon, Zachary Laksman, Jean Champagne, Chantale Simard, Andrew D. Krahn, Benoît Drolet

Bibliographic record

VenueExperimental Physiology · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaSt. Paul's HospitalUniversité LavalInstitut universitaire de cardiologie et de pneumologie de Québec
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBrugada syndromePhenotypeElectrophysiologyLong QT syndromeInternal medicineLoss functionCardiac arrhythmiaMutationShort QT syndromeCardiologyBiologyMedicineGeneticsQT intervalGeneAtrial fibrillation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

New Findings What is the role of SCN5A‐C683R? SCN5A ‐C683R is a novel variant associated with an uncommon phenotype of adrenaline‐triggered ventricular arrhythmia in the absence of a distinct ECG phenotype. What is the main finding and its importance? Functional studies demonstrated that Na V 1.5/C683R results in a mixed electrophysiological phenotype with gain‐of‐function (GOF) and loss‐of‐function (LOF) properties compared with Na V 1.5/wild type. Gain‐of‐function properties are characterized by a significant increase of the maximal current density and a hyperpolarizing shift of the steady‐state activation. The LOF effect of Na V 1.5/C683R is characterized by increased closed‐state inactivation. Electrophysiological properties and clinical manifestation of SCN5A ‐C683R are different from long‐QT‐3 or Brugada syndrome and might represent a distinct inherited arrhythmia syndrome. Abstract Mutations of SCN5A have been identified as the genetic substrate of various inherited arrhythmia syndromes, including long‐QT‐3 and Brugada syndrome. We recently identified a novel SCN5A variant (C683R) in two genetically unrelated families. The index patients of both families experienced adrenaline‐triggered ventricular arrhythmia with cardiac arrest but did not show a specific ECG phenotype, raising the hypothesis that SCN5A ‐C683R might be a susceptibility variant and the genetic substrate of distinct inherited arrhythmia. We conducted functional cellular studies to characterize the electrophysiological properties of Na V 1.5/C683R in order to explore the potential pathogenicity of this novel variant. The C683R variant was engineered by site‐directed mutagenesis. Na V 1.5/wild type (WT) and Na V 1.5/C683R were expressed in tsA201 cells. Electrophysiological characterization of C683R was performed using the whole‐cell patch‐clamp technique. Adrenergic stimulation was mimicked by exposure to the protein kinase A activator 8‐CPT‐cAMP. The impact of β‐blockers was tested by exposing Na V 1.5/WT and Na V 1.5/C683R currents to propranolol and nadolol. C683R resulted in a co‐association of gain‐of‐function and loss‐of‐function properties of Na V 1.5. Gain‐of‐function properties were characterized by a significant increase of the maximal Na V 1.5 current density compared with Na V 1.5/WT (861 ± 309 vs. 627 ± 489 pA/pF; P &lt; 0.05, n ≥ 9) that was potentiated in Na V 1.5/C683R with 8‐CPT‐cAMP stimulation (869 ± 287 vs. 607 ± 320 pA/pF; P &lt; 0.05, n ≥ 12). C683R also resulted in a significant hyperpolarizing shift in the voltage of steady‐state activation (−65.4 ± 3.0 vs. −57.2 ± 4.8 mV; P &lt; 0.001), resulting in an increased window current compared with WT. The loss‐of‐function effect of Na V 1.5/C683R was characterized by significantly increased closed‐state inactivation compared with Na V 1.5/WT ( P &lt; 0.05). C683R is a novel SCN5A variant resulting in a co‐association of gain‐of‐function and loss‐of‐function properties of the cardiac sodium channel Na V 1.5. The phenotype is characterized by adrenaline‐triggered ventricular arrhythmias. Electrophysiological properties and clinical manifestations are different from long‐QT‐3 or Brugada syndrome and might represent a distinct inherited arrhythmia syndrome.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.033
Threshold uncertainty score0.879

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueExperimental PhysiologySame topicCardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmiasFrench-language works237,207