Contrasting mechanisms for photodissociation of methyl halides adsorbed on thin films of C<sub>6</sub>H<sub>6</sub> and C<sub>6</sub>F<sub>6</sub>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The mechanisms for photodissociation of methyl halides (CH3X, X = Cl, Br, I) have been studied for these molecules when adsorbed on thin films of C6H6 or C6F6 on copper single crystals, using time-of-flight spectroscopy with 248 nm and 193 nm light. For CH3Cl and CH3Br monolayers adsorbed on C6H6, two photodissociation pathways can be identified - neutral photodissociation similar to the gas-phase, and a dissociative electron attachment (DEA) pathway due to photoelectrons from the metal. The same methyl halides adsorbed on a C6F6 thin film display only neutral photodissociation, with the DEA pathway entirely absent due to intermolecular quenching via a LUMO-derived electronic band in the C6F6 thin film. For CH3I adsorbed on a C6F6 thin film, illumination with 248 nm light results in CH3 photofragments departing due to neutral photodissociation via the A-band absorption. When CH3I monolayers on C6H6 thin films are illuminated at the same wavelength, additional new photodissociation pathways are observed that are due to absorption in the molecular film with energy transfer leading to dissociation of the CH3I molecules adsorbed on top. The proposed mechanism for this photodissociation is via a charge-transfer complex for the C6H6 layer and adsorbed CH3I.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".