MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3121997482 · doi:10.1177/1535370220985473

Retinol-binding protein, retinol, and modified-relative-dose response in Ugandan children aged 12–23 months and their non-pregnant caregivers

2021· article· en· W3121997482 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Ralph D. Whitehead, Nicole D. Ford, Carine Mapango, Laird J. Ruth, Ming Zhang, Rosemary L. Schleicher, Sarah Ngalombi, Siti Halati, Martin Ahimbisibwe, Abdelrahman Lubowa, Jesse Sheftel, Sherry A. Tanumihardjo, Maria Elena Jefferds

Bibliographic record

VenueExperimental Biology and Medicine · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicRetinoids in leukemia and cellular processes
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersCanadian International Development Agency
KeywordsRetinolRetinol binding proteinVitaminDried blood spotEndocrinologyInternal medicineMedicineImmunoassayChemistryAntibodyImmunologyChromatography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Retinol-binding protein (RBP), retinol, and modified-relative-dose response (MRDR) are used to assess vitamin A status. We describe vitamin A status in Ugandan children and women using dried blood spot (DBS) RBP, serum RBP, plasma retinol, and MRDR and compare DBS-RBP, serum RBP, and plasma retinol. Blood was collected from 39 children aged 12–23 months and 28 non-pregnant mothers aged 15–49 years as a subsample from a survey in Amuria district, Uganda, in 2016. DBS RBP was assessed using a commercial enzyme immunoassay kit, serum RBP using an in-house sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, and plasma retinol/MRDR test using high-performance liquid chromatography. We examined (a) median concentration or value (Q1, Q3); (b) R 2 between DBS-RBP, serum RBP, and plasma retinol; and (c) Bland-Altman plots. Median (Q1, Q3) for children and mothers, respectively, were as follows: DBS-RBP 1.15 µmol/L (0.97, 1.42) and 1.73 (1.52, 1.96), serum RBP 0.95 µmol/L (0.78, 1.18) and 1.47 µmol/L (1.30, 1.79), plasma retinol 0.82 µmol/L (0.67, 0.99) and 1.33 µmol/L (1.22, 1.58), and MRDR 0.025 (0.014, 0.042) and 0.014 (0.009, 0.019). DBS RBP-serum RBP R 2 was 0.09 for both children and mothers. The mean biases were −0.19 µmol/L (95% limits of agreement [LOA] 0.62, −0.99) for children and −0.01 µmol/L (95% LOA −1.11, −1.31) for mothers. DBS RBP-plasma retinol R 2 was 0.11 for children and 0.13 for mothers. Mean biases were 0.33 µmol/L (95% LOA −0.37, 1.03) for children, and 0.29 µmol/L (95% LOA −0.69, 1.27) for mothers. Serum RBP-plasma retinol R 2 was 0.75 for children and 0.55 for mothers, with mean biases of 0.13 µmol/L (95% LOA −0.23, 0.49) for children and 0.18 µmol/L (95% LOA −0.61, 0.96) for mothers. Results varied by indicator and matrix. The serum RBP-retinol R 2 for children was moderate (0.75), but poor for other comparisons. Understanding the relationships among vitamin A indicators across contexts and population groups is needed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.028
Threshold uncertainty score0.761

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueExperimental Biology and MedicineSame topicRetinoids in leukemia and cellular processesFrench-language works237,207