MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3122230109

Exploration of Process and Competitive Factors of Entrepreneurship in Digital Space: A Multiple Case Study in Iran

2011· article· en· W3122230109 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Najmeh Hafezieh, Peyman Akhavan, Farjam Eshraghian

Bibliographic record

VenueSSRN Electronic Journal · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicDigitalization and Economic Development in Agriculture
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEntrepreneurshipTypologyThe InternetSpace (punctuation)BusinessProcess (computing)MarketingComputer scienceSociologyWorld Wide Web
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The purpose of this study is exploration of the process and competitive factors of entrepreneurship in digital space in Iran.In the last decades, the development and advancement of information and communication technologies (ICTs) and the business innovations related to them have defined a new economy which is known as “digital economy”. Establishing and running businesses in this digital space means carrying out a kind of electronic commerce by exploiting the internet and other electronic networks. The new digital economy provides exceptional opportunities for many entrepreneurs to create new ventures in different business areas according to electronic commerce models. Given that researchers in Iran have not studied digital entrepreneurship and there is a great interest in digital entrepreneurship, further research is needed on this subject. According to a research in Canada by Carrier, Raymond, and Eltaief (2004) on cyber entrepreneurship, we used the same method and studied five cases that work in digital entrepreneurship in Iran. In this paper, we first review the literature of digital entrepreneurship- digital entrepreneurship framework that include a typology of digital ventures and their characteristics, characteristics of digital entrepreneurs, and the distinctions between digital entrepreneurship and traditional one. Then we surveyed five digital entrepreneurs in Iran to explore the process of their entrepreneurship and competitive elements applied by them.The most notable contribution of our research is our focus on the process of this type of entrepreneurship and the steps which were used by entrepreneurs. Unlike the traditional forms of entrepreneurship, the entrepreneurs in cyber space in Iran did not examine their feasibility of their projects. And also the identification of a business opportunity created business ideas. The other contribution of our research is entrepreneurs’ competitive elements. We found 10 factors as the internet-based entrepreneurs’ competitive elements in Iran. Also we found interesting results about characteristics of internet-based entrepreneurs.This paper provides an overview of internet-based entrepreneurship in Iran. According to collected information, we propose the process of internet-based entrepreneurship and its competitive elements, and establish a basis for future research.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.026

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0060.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSSRN Electronic JournalSame topicDigitalization and Economic Development in AgricultureFrench-language works237,207