MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3122331347 · doi:10.1093/mnras/stab1181

The orbit and stellar masses of the archetype colliding-wind binary WR 140

2021· article· en· W3122331347 on OpenAlexafffund
Joshua D. Thomas, Noel D. Richardson, J. J. Eldridge, Gail Schaefer, John D. Monnier, H. Sana, A. F. J. Moffat, P. M. Williams, M. F. Corcoran, I. R. Stevens, G. Weigelt, Farrah D Zainol, Narsireddy Anugu, J.-B. Le Bouquin, Theo ten Brummelaar, F. Campos, Andrew A. Couperus, Claire L. Davies, Jacob Ennis, Thomas Eversberg, O. Garde, Tyler Gardner, Joan Guarro Fló, Stefan Kraus, Aaron Labdon, Cyprien Lanthermann, R. Leadbeater, T. Lester, Courtney Maki, Brendan McBride, D. Özuyar, J. Ribeiro, Benjamin R. Setterholm, Berthold Stober, Mackenna L. Wood, Uwe Zurmühl

Bibliographic record

VenueMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicStellar, planetary, and galactic studies
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalCentre for Research in Astrophysics of Québec
FundersFonds Wetenschappelijk OnderzoekH2020 European Research CouncilNational Aeronautics and Space AdministrationGeorgia State UniversityEuropean Space AgencyNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaEuropean CommissionOffice of the Vice President for Research and Economic Development, University at BuffaloNational Science Foundation
KeywordsPhysicsAstrophysicsBinary numberRadial velocityOrbital elementsOrbital inclinationWolf–Rayet starAstronomyOrbit (dynamics)AstrometryPopulationStellar massBinary starStar (game theory)Mass ratioStarsStar formationMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT We present updated orbital elements for the Wolf–Rayet (WR) binary WR 140 (HD 193793; WC7pd + O5.5fc). The new orbital elements were derived using previously published measurements along with 160 new radial velocity measurements across the 2016 periastron passage of WR 140. Additionally, four new measurements of the orbital astrometry were collected with the CHARA Array. With these measurements, we derive stellar masses of $M_{\rm WR} = 10.31\pm 0.45 \, \mathrm{M}_\odot$ and $M_{\rm O} = 29.27\pm 1.14 \, \mathrm{M}_{\odot }$. We also include a discussion of the evolutionary history of this system from the Binary Population and Spectral Synthesis model grid to show that this WR star likely formed primarily through mass-loss in the stellar winds, with only a moderate amount of mass lost or transferred through binary interactions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.206
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations38
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society→Same topicStellar, planetary, and galactic studies→French-language works237,207→