Influence of Coating Technologies on Frictional Properties of Foil Bearings During Start/Stop Conditions
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The main objective of this paper is to study and compare the performance characteristics of foil bearings for a typical turboblower during start/stop conditions. The test bearings feature three-segment bump foils and a full smooth top foil with a nominal diameter of 70 mm and an aspect ratio of 1. All foils are made out of Inconel 718 and have a thickness of 0.2 mm (0.008”). Three coatings, applied to the top foil, have been evaluated during the test campaign: PTFE, Molybdenum-Titanium Nitride (MoTiN) and Molybdenum-Aluminum-Titanium Nitride (MoAlTiN). MoTiN and MoAlTiN were applied using physical vapor deposition (PVD) technology. Each bearing was instrumented with sixteen thermocouples located within the bearing sleeve 1 mm away from its inner diameter. Thermocouples allow the measurement of the bearing temperature in the axial and circumferential directions. Bearing displacement was measured using eight proximity probes located at each side of the bearing (four per side). Overall vibrations of the bearing under test were measured via two accelerometers located on top of the bearing housing in the vertical and horizontal directions. In addition, a torque arm mechanism was used to measure the bearing shear force; hence deduce the friction coefficient, friction torque and total power loss. The paper discusses friction and wear results obtained after one hundred start-stop tests for each bearing. A tribological and microstructural analysis is also presented and discussed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".