MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3122336416

Mapping the field: Mindfulness and ethos in the Irish Catholic primary school

2020· article· en· W3122336416 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Thomas G. Carroll

Bibliographic record

VenueResearchOnline@ND (The University of Notre Dame) · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicReligious Education and Schools
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIrishEthosField (mathematics)MindfulnessSociologyPolitical sciencePedagogyPsychologyLawPhilosophyPsychotherapist
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Name: Thomas Carroll B.Ed, M.A. Title: Mapping the field: Mindfulness and ethos in the Irish Catholic primary school The phenomenon of mindfulness has become ever more popular in an increasingly pluralist Western society. Mindfulness is practised in various contexts, including schools and colleges with a religious ethos. This project will explore how these two concepts can interact with each other. The contemporary understanding of mindfulness has its origins in Buddhist meditation. However, the concept has developed and sometimes mutated into various forms of practice which are disembedded from their original spiritual philosophy. This will be examined through dialogue with two interlocutors. Further, this will allow for a frame to examine how this relationship influences religious education in Ireland. The first interlocutor is the Canadian philosopher Charles Taylor whose seminal work, ‘A Secular Age’, outlines three distinct modes of secularity. Taylor examines how the conditions of belief have changed and how the self seeks meaning in an age where belief in the divine is no longer axiomatic. Irish theologian Michael Paul Gallagher offers a theological perspective on how the Christian faith can be translated into dialogue with Irish secular culture, we well as addressing the crisis of culture and religious imagination rather than the crisis of faith in Ireland.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.304
Threshold uncertainty score0.649

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.062
GPT teacher head0.334
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueResearchOnline@ND (The University of Notre Dame)Same topicReligious Education and SchoolsFrench-language works237,207