MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3122418742 · doi:10.1097/btf.0000000000000309

Fractures of the Great Toe Proximal Phalanx: A Case Series and Review of the Literature

2021· article· en· W3122418742 on OpenAlexaff
Joshua D. Dworkin, Evan C. Harris, Paul M. Ryan

Bibliographic record

VenueTechniques in Foot & Ankle Surgery · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBone fractures and treatments
Canadian institutionsKootenay Association for Science & Technology
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineSagittal planeCohortReduction (mathematics)PhalanxRadiographySurgeryRetrospective cohort studyInternal fixationFixation (population genetics)OrthodonticsPopulationRadiologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Phalangeal fractures are the most common fractures seen in the foot, especially in the great toe. Acceptable angulations for fractures of the proximal phalanx are not known. To determine practice trends, a retrospective review of consecutive patients treated at a single institution from January 2011 to August 2014 was performed. All patients were skeletally mature with fractures to the diaphysis of the proximal phalanx with or without intra-articular extension. Outcomes from the medical record review included the type of treatment, radiographic alignment, and visual analog pain scores. Of the 12 patients reviewed, 4 sustained crush injuries and 8 sustained axial load injuries. Statistical analysis was done using Student’s t test for a normally distributed population. Nine of the 12 fractures were treated with manipulation, 7 were closed reduction and percutaneous pinning (CRPP), and 2 were isolated closed reduction without internal fixation. Two of the 9 patients with CRPP required additional surgery. The comparison between the sagittal plane angulation in the closed reduction cohort was 25 degrees compared with 42 degrees in the CRPP cohort ( P =0.02). The final sagittal plane angulation comparison was not significant 12 versus 15 degrees ( P =0.55). In the transverse plane, no statistical difference was seen between the 2 cohorts with an initial angulation of 8 degrees in the closed reduction cohort versus 13 degrees in the CRPP cohort ( P =0.45). The final transverse angulation was symmetric with a mean of 4 degrees in each cohort ( P =0.91). The patients in this review were more likely to be treated with operative intervention when initial angulation had a mean of 42 degrees in the sagittal plane. Patients with initial mean angulation of 25 degrees were more likely to be treated with a closed reduction. Final sagittal plane angulations of 12 to 15 degrees were associated with good outcomes. This series may help surgeons and patients in their shared decision making when faced with shaft fractures of the proximal phalanx. Level of Evidence: Level IV—retrospective cohort study.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.761
Threshold uncertainty score0.298

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.292
Teacher spread0.277 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTechniques in Foot & Ankle SurgerySame topicBone fractures and treatmentsFrench-language works237,207