MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3122453089

Computational Study of the Structure of Lactoperoxidase and its Active Site

2016· article· en· W3122453089 on OpenAlex
Brandon Manary, Jorge Llano

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueURSCA Proceedings · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicNeutrophil, Myeloperoxidase and Oxidative Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsMacEwan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLactoperoxidaseActive siteChemistryCatalysisOxidizing agentProtein structureIntermolecular forceComputational chemistryEnzymeBiochemistryMoleculeOrganic chemistryPeroxidase
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Lactoperoxidase (LPO) is an enzyme that fights in the first line of defense against infection. LPO catalyzes the formation of oxidizing chemicals that indiscriminately kill foreign microbes and viruses caught in the mucous membranes of vulnerable body parts, namely of the eyes and upper airways. Because of its importance for the immune system, the molecular structure and efficacy of native forms of LPO against various pathogens have been studied for potential applications in medical therapies. Despite its frequency in research, the mechanism by which LPO converts common ions, such as chloride, into antimicrobial agents has not been resolved in atomistic detail. Thus, we seek to determine catalytic mechanism of LPO using the methods of computational chemistry, which incorporates classical and quantum mechanics to simulate chemical phenomena. To start, we examined various three-dimensional structures of LPO taken from the Protein Data Bank to estimate the variability and flexibility of the active site and the overall protein. An active-site structural model was then constructed to compute the spatial distribution and strength of intermolecular forces at play in the LPO active site using a force field specially optimized for proteins. The resulting implications to substrate binding and catalysis were analyzed. This allows us to progress to the next stage, where quantum chemical methods will be used to ultimately elucidate the catalytic mechanism of LPO. *Indicates faculty mentor.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.038
Threshold uncertainty score0.270

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it