Estudio Cinemático de los Saltos Ornamentales en trampolín: Una Visión Hacia lo Corporal
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This research consisted of analyzing the biomechanical characteristics involved in each phase of a series of ornamental jumps on the three-meter springboard. For this, video recordings were made of nine (9) male youth athletes who participated in the XVII Junior World Cup of Ornamental Jumping, Aachen, Germany. For the collection and analysis of the data in three dimensions, two Panasonic cameras were placed between 90 ° and 120 °. 21 anatomical points and two trampoline points were digitized. Subsequently, the kinematic variables were quantified and analyzed with the computerized motion analysis software "Hu-m-an" v. 5.0. It was concluded that the projection characteristics are fundamental for the achievement of the flight phase and entry into the water, obtaining results similar to those registered in international investigations. The projection angle average the 80°. Deficiencies were found in the flight phase to define and group the body, affecting aesthetics and body, in the same way at the time of entering the water an over-effort of the upper body was appreciated due to the passivity of the lower body, which caused an entry hyperextension leaving the lower limbs delayed and displacing water during entry.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".