MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3122576339 · doi:10.5539/ijel.v11n2p46

The Role of the Blackboard LMS in EFL Course Delivery During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Investigating Attitudes and Perceptions of Faculty and Students

2021· article· en· W3122576339 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Abdullah M. Almelhi

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of English Linguistics · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicCommunication in Education and Healthcare
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBlackboard (design pattern)Blended learningPsychologyMedical educationHigher educationEducational technologyPedagogyMedicineComputer sciencePolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper aimed to identify faculty perceptions of VLEs and their students’ attitudes towards e-learning in the time of the pandemic. Towards this aim, the researcher used two surveys in a descriptive study to collect data from 47 EFL instructors and 103 students regarding a variety of constructs about e-learning effectiveness and attitudes, especially in the Corona virus time. Results indicated that the instructors’ perceptions of the Blackboard LMS were greatly positive as to establishing efficient teacher-students’ communication, facilitating students’ comprehension, boosting up their instrumental motivation, engaging them in active, interactive learning, and creating instructor-students’ rapport. The students’ attitudes survey revealed that, overall, students had positive attitudes towards using Blackboard LMS during the pandemic due to convenience of use, platform availability, system quality and quality of e-learning over Blackboard. Other reasons include users’ personal factors such as their satisfaction tendency, their self-confidence initiated by the VLE of Blackboard, their enjoyment of learning in this medium, the interesting and useful learning activities and tools as well as their staying safe in this mode of learning in the pandemic time. Other factors identified include the learners’ willingness to continue learning via Blackboard and their expectation that full-time learning online would replace traditional face-to-face learning. The study concludes that teachers’ and students’ perceptions and attitudes towards VLEs, with particular reference to Blackboard, could be valuable to faculty and institutions in their quality assurance efforts and the development of promising online courses and programs in EFL to satisfy the needs of students. Eventually, the study discusses suggested improvements and implications for e-learning on the Blackboard Lean platform as perceived by students and teachers alike to protect students through online education as an alternative to traditional education during the Corona Virus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) in present and future waves of the pandemic.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.019
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.037
Threshold uncertainty score0.989

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.019
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.058
GPT teacher head0.447
Teacher spread0.389 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations26
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of English LinguisticsSame topicCommunication in Education and HealthcareFrench-language works237,207