MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3122694758

Why Can't We Be Like France? How the Right to Bear Arms Got Left Out of the Declaration of Rights and How Gun Registration was Decreed Just In Time For the Nazi Occupation

2016· article· en· W3122694758 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Stephen P. Halbrook

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCriminal Law and Evidence
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLawPolitical scienceOpposition (politics)Possession (linguistics)PoliticsLeft-wing politicsMartial law
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

IV. 1935: PRIME MINISTER PIERRE LAVAL DECREES FIREARM REGISTRATION Having no historical recognition of a fundamental right to keep and bear arms, it would not be difficult for the French government to require that firearms be registered, which would make it easier to confiscate them. Prime Minister Pierre Laval decreed such a law in 1935, just five years before he would become the chief collaborator with Nazi Germany of occupied France. (180) The firearm registration records would be available to the French police who administered Nazi occupation policies, including the death penalty for possession of firearms. (181) France in the mid-1930s experienced conflict between political factions and the collapse of governments. (182) The most volatile disturbances rocked Paris on February 6, 1934, in which police and Mobile Guards opened fire on civilians, killing sixteen. (183) One policeman was killed. (184) To politicians, clamping down on civilian gun ownership appeared to be a remedy. On June 8, 1935, the Chamber of Deputies passed an enabling act that granted Prime Minister Pierre Laval, whose cabinet included moderates and Radical-Socialists, the power to rule by decree-law. (185) In opposition to rightist groups such as the Croix de Feu (Cross of Fire), the Radicals joined with the Socialists and Communists in the Front Populaire. (186) By fall, the leftist press warned that the Croix de Feu was planning to seize power, seeking to alarm the Radical party conference meeting held from October 24-27. (187) To allay that fear, the government decreed the strengthening of the game mobile mandated that authorities be notified of public meetings and restricted firearm possession. (188) The Laval law decree (decret-lois) was proclaimed on October 23, 1935, by the Cabinet without legislative action under the enabling act of June 8. (189) Introduced by the previous government, it was reported by Chauvin as a bill concerning demonstrations on public streets, and commerce, import and possession of arms. (190) Leon Berard, Minister of Justice, and Joseph Paganon, Minister of the Interior, formally proposed the law. (191) The decree defined and restricted war weapons, restricted importation of firearms, extended recordkeeping requirements by firearms manufacturers and dealers, including the keeping of daily registers, and prohibited sale of firearms by flea market vendors. (192) Its most radical provisions required registration of firearm owners and punished violators without regard to any evil intent. Specifically, Article 9 stated: Each person in possession of a firearm at the enactment of the present decree must make a declaration of it to the prefect or the sub-prefect of the place of his residence within the time limit of one month. Anyone after the enactment of the present decree who receives a firearm must make a declaration of it to the prefect or the sub-prefect of the place of his residence within the time limit of 8 days. Receipts of the declarations referenced in the two previous paragraphs will be delivered to the concerned parties. Each violation of the requirements of the first two paragraphs of the present article shall be punishable by a fine of 100 to 1,000 Francs. The court in addition will order the forfeiture of the weapon.... Failure to comply with this order shall be punishable with imprisonment of from six months to two years.... (193) However, the registration requirement did not apply to hunting guns or to historic or collectable firearms. (194) It was prominently publicized that the decree requires anyone in possession of arms to declare his place of residency to the prefect or his assistant. (195) The deadline for registration of arms was one month, expiring on November 24, 1935. (196) Regulations to implement the above decree were promulgated on November 22, 1935. (197) Registration of a firearm included one's name, date and place of birth, nationality, profession, domicile, and description of the firearm-type, caliber, manufacturer, and serial number if it existed. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.189
Threshold uncertainty score0.375

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0200.022
Scholarly communication0.0230.013
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0120.013
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0160.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.300
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCriminal Law and EvidenceFrench-language works237,207