Migration and Urbanization in Francophone West Africa: A review of the recent empirical evidence
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cette contribution se propose de réexaminer le rôle des migrations dans l’urbanisation du monde en \ndéveloppement, en présentant une synthèse des résultats de recherches menées en Afrique de l’Ouest \nfrancophone. La contribution de la migration à l’urbanisation est considérée du point de vue tant \ndémographique, qu’économique et géographique. Elle présente le contexte de l’urbanisation, décrit les \nnouvelles tendances des flux migratoires entre les milieux urbains et ruraux, et analyse comment les migrants \ns’insèrent dans la ville et s’adaptent à l’économie urbaine. \nLes conclusions montrent que les migrants s’adaptent fort bien à la vie urbaine et que les problèmes \nd’insertion urbaine ne concernent pas seulement les migrants mais tous les urbains, en particulier les jeunes. \nCependant, l’insertion économique et sociale devrait également être étudiée du point de vue rural, en prenant \nen compte les flux migratoires récents de l’urbain au rural, ainsi que le ralentissement de la croissance \nurbaine.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".