MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3122751372 · doi:10.1039/d0nr07858a

Tailored growth of graphene oxide liquid crystals with controlled polymer crystallization in GO-polymer composites

2021· article· en· W3122751372 on OpenAlexaff
Soh Jin Mun, Yul Hui Shim, Geon Woong Kim, Sung Hwan Koo, Hyungju Ahn, Tae Joo Shin, Sang Ouk Kim

Bibliographic record

VenueNanoscale · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicGraphene research and applications
Canadian institutionsKootenay Association for Science & Technology
FundersMinistry of Science and ICT, South KoreaNational Research Foundation of KoreaPohang University of Science and TechnologyUlsan National Institute of Science and TechnologyNational Research Foundation
KeywordsGrapheneCrystallinityCrystallizationMaterials scienceOxideCrystallization of polymersPolymerComposite materialChemical engineeringKineticsNanotechnologyMetallurgy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Graphene Oxides (GOs) have been frequently employed as fillers in polymer-based applications. While GO is known to nucleate polymer crystallization in GO-polymer composites reinforcing the mechanical properties of semicrystalline polymers, its counter effect on how polymer crystallization can alter the microstructure of GO has rarely been systematically studied yet. In this work, we study the GO nematic liquid crystal (LC) phase during polymer crystallization focusing on their hierarchical structures by employing in situ small/wide-angle X-ray scattering/diffraction (SAXS/WAXD) techniques. We found that GO LC and polymer crystals co-exist in the GO/polymer complex, where the overall liquid crystallinity is influenced by polymer crystallization. While polymer crystallizes in bulk or at the interface depending on the cooling rate, the interfacial crystallization of poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG) on GO improves both GO alignment and orientation of PEG crystal. This work provides an opportunity to develop a hierarchical structure of GO-based crystalline polymer nanocomposites, whose directionality can be controlled by polymer crystallization under proper cooling rates.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.510

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNanoscaleSame topicGraphene research and applicationsFrench-language works237,207