Biodegradation of Aromatic Hydrocarbons by Methanogenic Consortia and Groundwater-Associated Microbial Communities
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The biodegradation of hydrocarbons is an important environmental process responsible for in situ remediation of crude oil and gas components. Microorganisms of many lineages and redox conditions have been characterized to degrade numerous types of petroleum hydrocarbons, including those with aromatic structures. Alkyl-substituted mono- and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons are more chemically reactive than their unsubstituted counterparts, and as such their anaerobic degradation pathways have been studied to varying degrees. Aromatic hydrocarbons require enzymatic functionalization before biodegradation can occur; these activation enzymes and products are often unique to anaerobic reactions, therefore identifying the metabolites produced or the enzymes carrying out these reactions lends evidence to identifying in situ bioremediation of aromatic hydrocarbon contamination. Hydrocarbon biodegradation in the deep subsurface is often associated with methanogenesis. Anaerobic toluene degradation has been extensively studied and has been shown in multiple studies to involve an activation process known as fumarate addition, however methanogenic biodegradation of other alkylbenzenes and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons is comparatively poorly understood. In this work, the biodegradation of ethylbenzene and p-xylene was examined in the presence of toluene; p-toluic acid was found as a metabolite of p-xylene biotransformation, but no evidence of fumarate addition to either p-xylene or ethylbenzene were observed. A second methanogenic biodegradation study of naphthalene, 2-methylnaphthalene, and phenanthrene revealed 2-naphthoic acid as the primary metabolite produced by microbial cultures. A third study involved evaluating the use of a trapping device for passively sampling microorganisms from groundwater contaminated with aromatic hydrocarbons; this study showed that the chosen sorptive material did not influence the biodiversity of microbial communities, did not influence the rate of hydrocarbon biodegradation, and the presence of hydrocarbons was correlated to higher biomass recovery.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".