MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3122996534 · doi:10.7202/1073326ar

Retour aux traditions — signe de réussite sociale : les rondels de la Collection Hosmer (Université McGill, Montréal)

2020· article· en· W3122996534 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Ariane Isler-de Jongh

Bibliographic record

VenueRACAR Revue d art canadienne · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical Art and Culture Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFlemishPaintingArtArt historyStained glassVisual artsArchaeologyHistory

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The collection of domestic stained glass and glass paintings recently set up in the new building of the McGill School of Architecture used to decorate the main staircase and the dining-room windows of Charles Hosmer’s house, built by Montreal architect Edward Maxwell around the turn of the century. Charles R. Hosmer was then a prominent businessman, the head of Ogilvie Flour Mills, and his house on Drummond Street was a sign of his position in the flourishing city of 1900. It was to be the house of an art collector, who was interested in paintings as well as in “objets d’art,” which he would buy himself or through agents. Indeed we know from Maxwell’s ledgers that these glass paintings were acquired as a group from a London dealer of Flemish or Dutch origin, Martin van Straaten. This collection of 39 small domestic glass panels, of varied quality and origins, comprises Flemish and Dutch roundels, piecess from the Rhineland and Switzerland, and some heraldic panels. This type of glass used to adorn windows of wealthy houses, private chapels or cloisters. The roundel itself is a single piece of colourless glass, circular, oval or rectangular, painted with grisaille and silver-satin and occasionally, after the sixteenth century, with coloured enamels. The Swiss panels, on the other hand, consist of a main piece in the centre, richly framed with decorative and allegorical subjects. McGill’s Hosmer Collection is, as far as we know, unique in Canada. In acquiring it, Charles Hosmer followed the lead of British collectors, who had been keenly interested in northern European domestic glass, at least since the eighteenth century. These small panels are of average quality, although some of them are outstanding. As a group, they present a remarkable anthology of styles and techniques in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries, as well as examples of nineteenth-century repairs or even pastiches. The catalogue consists of a check-list according to the Corpus vitrearum norms (thus representing the first contribution to the Canadian C.V.), accompanied by detailed notices describing the current state of research.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.586
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.173
Teacher spread0.151 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2020
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRACAR Revue d art canadienneSame topicHistorical Art and Culture StudiesFrench-language works237,207