Facial Transplantation in a Nationalized Health System: The Canadian Experience
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Facial transplantation (FT) is recognized as the ultimate reconstruction for severely disfigured patients. The substantial cost of these procedures in a nationalized health system has not been extensively published. The first Canadian FT performed in May 2018 was a great opportunity to address this subject and evaluate the viability of such a program. METHODS: A detailed patient chart review was performed and a cost per unit approach was used to estimate the procedure cost. The preoperative, operative, and the postoperative periods up to 1-year after the surgery were analyzed. Financial support from private sponsors and Hospital Fund donations were considered. The literature on international FT and national solid organ transplantation was reviewed. RESULTS: The overall 1-year cost was estimated at $440,224 (2018 CAD). The costs are explained by a long hospital length of stay, costly immunosuppressive therapy, and high immunosuppression-related complications. Those findings are consistent with international FT literature. The societal impact of the surgery was minimized with a $36,921 (2018 CAD) grant obtained from an external contributor. Interestingly, the hospital foundation sustained a 794% increase in donations ($1,787,148; 2019 CAD) the year following the surgery. CONCLUSION: Our experience confirmed that the combination of private funding, with positive goodwill and hospital donations, is a workable model for innovative surgery in the setting of a nationalized health system with financial restrictions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".