Stability analysis of double V-shaped gully embankment: dimension-reduced calculation method
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Slope stability is generally analyzed by a two-dimensional (2D) method, ignoring the spatial effect (SE), which no longer meets the evaluation accuracy requirement. This problem is particularly prominent for embankments built on double V-shaped gullies (E-DVSG), which is a typical but unique topography in mountainous areas. Moreover, the technical requirements for engineers will increase sharply if a three-dimensional (3D) slope stability calculation method is adopted. To tackle this issue, pragmatically, a dimension-reduced slope stability analysis method (DR-SSAM) considering the SE of the E-DVSG was proposed and verified by a case study. Specifically, the DR-SSAM obtained the 3D safety factor of the E-DVSG by using the spatial effect curves and the safety factor from the 2D model. The results showed that this method was rational and efficient for engineering applications. In addition, the SE generation mechanism and condition, along with the influences resulting from the major factors, were addressed thoroughly.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".