MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3123229599 · doi:10.1002/adom.202100176

Multi‐Functional Metasurface: Visibly and RF Transparent, NIR Control and Low Thermal Emissivity

2021· preprint· en· W3123229599 on OpenAlexaff
Mahdi Safari, Nazir P. Kherani, George V. Eleftheriades

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvanced Optical Materials · 2021
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicMetamaterials and Metasurfaces Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMetamaterialMaterials scienceOptoelectronicsOpacityLow emissivityEmissivityIndium tin oxideRadio frequencyReflection (computer programming)Energy conservationDielectricEfficient energy useOpticsComputer scienceNanotechnologyElectrical engineeringTelecommunicationsPhysicsThin filmEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Rapid advances in metamaterial technology are enabling the engineering of wave–matter interactions heretofore not realized and functionalities with potentially far‐reaching implications for major challenges in the fields of energy conservation and radio frequency (RF) communication. A visibly and RF transparent composite metasurface utilizing dielectric–metal spectrally selective coatings with high near‐infrared control and low thermal emissivity is proposed, thus achieving a multi‐functional metasurface capable of enhancing fifth‐generation (5G) communication efficiency and exhibiting energy conservation features. The proposed meta‐glass yields 92% peak RF transmission at 30 GHz which corresponds to 20% and 90% enhancement when compared to plain glass and low‐emissive glass substrates. This meta‐glass possesses 86% peak optical transparency at λ = 550 nm, >60% near‐infrared reflection, and >80% mid‐infrared reflection which corresponds to ≈0.2 thermal emissivity. The proposed metasurface design is highly flexible and can be tuned to operate over different frequency ranges owing to its frequency scalability. This study provides a better alternative using earth‐abundant materials compared to low‐emissive glass based on indium tin oxide while boosting the efficiency of 5G communication amenable to window systems demanding simultaneous functionalities for emergent smart/energy‐efficient buildings/cities and autonomous transportation applications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAdvanced Optical MaterialsSame topicMetamaterials and Metasurfaces ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207