Recent Progress in Development of Ductile Fracture Arrest Methodology Based on CTOA: Test Standard, Transferability and Methodology
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Significant progress has been made in development of a new fracture arrest methodology based on a toughness parameter designed to characterize propagation — the crack-tip opening angle (CTOA). A CTOA test procedure using lab-scale DWTT-type specimens has been standardized by ASTM, and recently published experimental work has demonstrated transferability of CTOA from DWTT to full-scale pipe. This paper will present the basic methodology for determination of CTOA using DWTT-type specimens (i.e., ASTM E3039) and other specimens such as modified double-cantilever-beam (MDCB). Recent numerical studies using cohesive zone models (CZM) and others based on damage mechanics will be discussed, including models of full-scale pipe fracture. The effects on CTOA of loading rate, specimen flattening and constraint (bending vs. tension) will be reviewed. The effect on CTOA of loading rate between quasi-static and impact (covering five orders of magnitude) is small or negligible, being within experimental scatter. Observed differences between surface and mid-thickness CTOA values will be discussed. Models of DWTT specimens using damage mechanics have shown that the CTOA for tensile loading is the same at the surface and mid-thickness and equal to the mid-thickness value for bend loading, but that the surface CTOA is significantly larger than the mid-thickness CTOA in bending. Model calculations have revealed the dependence of crack velocity on stress for a given CTOA, enabling construction of fracture resistance curves (pressure required to propagate fracture as a function of crack velocity). These first-principles curves based on CTOA can then be used in the Battelle two-curve model (BTCM) to replace empirical resistance curves based on Charpy absorbed energy (Cv). It has been known for some time that Cv over-represents the propagation resistance for high-strength high-toughness steels, requiring empirical “correction factors” to Cv in the BTCM. Experiments have shown that there is a non-linear correlation between Cv and CTOA, explaining the need for correction factors to Cv and supporting the use of CTOA as a more appropriate propagation toughness.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".