Taxonomic richness and host range of tropical Asian mussel‐associated mite assemblages (Acari: Unionicolidae) with a description of a new subgenus and species of parasitic mite from freshwater pearl mussels (Unionida: Margaritiferidae)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Freshwater pearl mussels (Bivalvia: Margaritiferidae) are among the most imperiled groups of animals globally. While the parasites and symbionts of the Margaritiferidae are rather poorly known, these mussels were thought to be free of parasitic mites (Acari: Unionicolidae: Unionicola). Here, we report on the discovery of a mite species being associated with the endangered freshwater pearl mussel Gibbosula laosensis (Lea, 1863) from Myanmar. This species, Unionicola (Gibbosulicola) sella subgen. & sp. nov., morphologically resembles mites belonging to the subgenera Coelaturicola and Fulleratax (African and Southeast Asian groups, respectively). Our novel discovery expands the host range of Unionicola mites and reveals that all freshwater mussel families of the order Unionida host these aquatic mites. Our phylogenetic research and available published data reveal that the mussel-associated mite assemblage in Southeast and South Asia contains not less than 17 species and 8 subgenera. Currently, the regional taxonomic richness of this group seems to be largely underestimated. We found that mussel mites from Southeast Asia are narrow host specialists, which are known to occur in a single or a few closely related species belonging to one or two sister genera of freshwater mussels. Finally, our results indicate that mussel mites share generally restricted ranges and that their distribution patterns in Southeast Asia are largely congruent with the boundaries of biogeographic subregions delineated on the basis of phylogenetic studies of freshwater mussels.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".